Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Hunter v. Buttigieg et al
as 4:2023cv04211
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
Pete Buttigieg, Officer Levi and David Billion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. USA
as 7:2023cv00933
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter Cook
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hunter v. USA
as 1:2021cv00168
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kristoff Michael Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hunter v. Jordan et al
as 3:2020cv00833
Defendant:
Lt. Owens, Warden Scott Jordan, Lt. Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv04042
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, President of the U S Donald Trump, Andrew M Saul and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hunter v. Unknown Named Secretary Department of Transportation South Dakota et al
as 4:2020cv04006
Petitioner:
Michael Howard Hunter and Michael Hunter
Respondent:
Unknown Named Secretary Department of Transportation South Dakota and Unknown Named South Dakota Troopers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hunter v. Daniels et al
as 1:2019cv00548
Defendant:
Charkes Daniels and Hugh J. Hurwtz
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Lopez et al
as 6:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Capt. Lopez, Lt. Nutt, Sgt. Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAURY v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00172
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HUNTER HAURY
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAURY v. LOTZ
as 1:2017cv02544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUNTER HAURY
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN LOTZ
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
