Cases 1 - 10 of 11
McMullen v. Harrisburg Capitol Police et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael McMullen
Defendant:
Harrisburg Capitol Police, Officer John Doe and UPMC Harrisburg Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRISCI v. BRIDGEVILLE RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01909
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCMULLEN, BRIDGEVILLE RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC trading and doing business as DEE JAY'S BBQ RIBS & GRILLE, MT. NEBO FOODS, LLC trading and doing business as DEE JAYS BBQ RIBS & GRILLE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY CRISCI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adkins v. Mt. Nebo Foods, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Chasity D. Adkins
Defendant:
Mt. Nebo Foods, LLC doing business as Dee Jays BBQ Ribs & Grille, Dewey J. Guida Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Dee Jays BBQ Ribs and Grille, Guida J. Dewey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WATERMAN v. COHERENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02623
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
II-VI INCORPORATED, BEVERLY KAY MATTHEWS, MICHAEL MCMULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Costa v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04108
Defendant:
Beverly Kay Matthews, Garry Rogerson, Coherent, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Costa
SHIREY v. COHERENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv10698
Defendant:
BEVERLY KAY MATTHEWS, GARRY ROGERSON, COHERENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOSH SHIREY
Diaz v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03990
Plaintiff:
Greydy Diaz
Defendant:
II-VI Incorporated, Beverly Kay Matthews, Watson Merger Sub Inc. and others
Stein v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03775
Defendant:
Garry Rogerson, Ph.D., Beverly Kay Matthews, Coherent, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
McMullens v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00328
Defendant:
John Rupert, Vickie Barrow, Gaye Karriker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McMullens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
