Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Melendez v. Hamilton et al
as 6:2023cv02337
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
Todd Hamilton, John Doe, Tiger Orlando Sanford LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MELENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08447
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MELENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robert J. Matthews v. FAT Brands Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01820
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Matthews and Michael Melendez
Defendant:
FAT Brands Inc., Andrew Wiederhorn, Ron Roe and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Kerry Chipman
MELENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99341
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melendez v. Arizona, State of
as 4:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Monica Lopez and Pima County Adult Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. McGinley et al
as 1:2017cv02239
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
Thomas S. McGinley and Thomas Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Caldero-Lopez
as 3:2016cv01292
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
Jose L. Caldero-Lopez and Puerto Rico Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
