Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Murphy v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2016cv03072
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yellowbear v. Lampert, et al
as 16-8128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN YELLOWBEAR, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, MICHAEL MURPHY, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, JOAN THAYER, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Executive Assistant and others
Yellowbear v. Lampert, et al
as 16-8114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN YELLOWBEAR, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, MICHAEL MURPHY, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, JOAN THAYER, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Executive Assistant and others
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2016cv11306
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Michael Murphy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murphy v. Arnold
as 2:2015cv02321
Petitioner:
Michael Murphy
Respondent:
Eric Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Montoya et al
as 1:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
FNU Montoya and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Murphy et al
as 3:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Frank Walker
Defendant:
Michael Murphy, Bobby Thomson and Robert Bourbo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:1984cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections , Terry Morris, Jimmy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Heritier et al
as 2:2014cv12054
Plaintiff:
Joses Braxton
Defendant:
Tom Heritier and Michael Murphy
Cessna v. Lewis et al
as 3:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Cessna
Defendant:
Robin M. Lewis, Wayne J. Gavin, Ronda Ellett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
