Cases 31 - 40 of 324
Thompson v. JK Gertler Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02481
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson
Defendant:
JK Gertler Holdings LLC and RA Gertler Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thompson v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv12754
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Safeway, Inc., Albertson's Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Tyler Thompson
as 23-1288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYLER MICHAEL THOMPSON
Thompson v. Gurule
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Frankie Elyse Gurule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waugh v. Weinhoeft et al
as 3:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Waugh
Defendant:
Steven D Weinhoeft, Laura J Jones, Nathan Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Eggink v. County of Marin et al
as 3:2022cv07719
Plaintiff:
Cynthis Eggink
Defendant:
County of Marin, Marin County Sheriff's Department and Michael Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Middletown et al
as 3:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Rogers
Defendant:
City of Middletown, Retired Chief of Police William McKenna, Sergeant Brian White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Libertus v. Harris et al
as 4:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Libertus
Defendant:
Peyton Keener Harris, Michael Thompson, Taylor Bort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22179
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21863
Plaintiff:
Shawn Thompson and SHAWN MICHAEL THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
