Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Lewis WallIn re: Lewis Wall
as 24-40196
Petitioner: In re: Lewis Michael Wall
Toppin et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09584
Plaintiff: Henisha Toppin, Shjayia Jones and J.T.
Defendant: City of New York, Marisa Louis-Jean, Brandon Agosto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03342
Plaintiff: JESSE MICHAEL WALL
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JUDGE J. ANDERSON, JUDGE WINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wall et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv02882
Defendant: 3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Wall and Cheryl Jane Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Narada Walls
as 22-4115
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: NARADA MICHAEL WALLS
Wall v. Lumpkin
as 21-40752
Petitioner / Appellant: Lewis Michael Wall
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
WALLS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56560
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WALLS JR
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reviv IP, LLC et al v. Revive IV Bars, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02560
Plaintiff: REVIV IP, LLC and REVIV MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant: REVIVE IV BARS, INC., Michael Wall and Revive IV Bars, Inc a Colorado Corporation doing business as Revive Colorado
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Wall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00055
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Defendant: Lewis Michael Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walls v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv05139
Plaintiff: Michael Walls
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?