Cases 1 - 10 of 407
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Joyce v. Patel
as 1:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Joyce
Defendant:
Ismail Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kie v. Lumpkin
as 24-40193
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Kie
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Doane v. Whatcom County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Doane
Defendant:
Whatcom County Jail, Martin Dubek and Brianna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne Jackson v. Trump et al
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Maga LLC., Proudboys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. USA
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Ford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 1:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birchfield v. Warden, FCI Yazoo City Low I
as 3:2023cv03136
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Birchfield
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Yazoo City Low I
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henegar v. Medical Staff of Sullivan County Jail
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Henegar
Defendant:
Medical Staff of Sullivan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
