Cases 11 - 20 of 22
HENDERSON v. WETZEL, ET AL et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS HENDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ET AL, NANCY A. GIROUX, ET AL, MELINDA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Clifford et al
as 1:2013cv01642
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Davis
Defendant:
Todd Clifford , Todd Fahlsing , Michele Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wagner et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 0:2013cv01461
Plaintiff:
Gary P. Wagner and Michelle Wagner
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Wagner et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gary P. Wagner and Michelle Wagner
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BEALE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BEALE
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, JEFFREY WITHERITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Aragon v. Wagner, et al
as 1:2012cv02516
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Aragon
Defendant:
Michele Wagner, Robert Kladde (I), John Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Securian Financial Services, Inc. v. Wagner et al
as 0:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
Securian Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle Wagner, Molly Symanietz, Mary Kay Kovaleski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
CARTER v. WAGNER et al
as 2:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS EDWARD CARTER
Defendant:
MICHELLE WAGNER, RANDY RICKERT and MARY SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
