Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wade v. Guerrero
as 26-10479
Petitioner:
Micky Dawn Wade
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc et al
as 1:2026cv05013
Plaintiff:
Antonio Elkerson
Defendant:
Kezar Life Sciences Inc, Graham Cooper, John Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. Weber
as 26-50196
Plaintiff:
Vanessa L. Clark
Defendant:
Attorney Christopher J. Weber, Christopher J. Weber, L.L.C., Texas Professional Limited Liability Company, Ashton Reid Kingsley and others
Sullivan v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 0:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Sullivan
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Redline Commerce Inc. doing business as Mika Micky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Michelle Higgins, et al v. Erin Weinstein
as 25-3352
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE HIGGINS, "Micki", TIFFANY DERAM and JOSHUA SMOTHERS
Defendant:
ERIN CARTWRIGHT WEINSTEIN and LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Lotze v. BMW of North America LLC
as 2:2025cv04644
Plaintiff:
Mickie Lotze
Defendant:
BMW of North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cole v. Frakes et al
as 8:2025cv00666
Plaintiff:
Frankie Levi Cole
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Micki Baum, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Iimas
as 25-2581
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICKIE IIMAS
Clark v. Weber et al
as 5:2025cv01268
Plaintiff:
Vanessa L. Clark
Defendant:
Attorney Christopher J. Weber, Christopher J. Weber, LLC, Ashton Reid Kingsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
