Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Boniface v. Price et al
as 9:2025cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jinbiha Boniface
Defendant:
Karren Price, James Payne, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gyee v. Price et al
as 9:2025cv00278
Plaintiff:
Min Gyee
Defendant:
Karren Price, James Payne, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al vs Price etal
as 9:2025cv00271
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams
Defendant:
James Payne, LeAnn Rafferty, Gerald Corbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aspinall v. Marshall et al
as 8:2025cv05445
Petitioner:
Brian Aspinall and Brian Anthony Aspinall
Respondent:
Will Marshall, III, Kevin Ong, William Mackelburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Adams v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2025cv00132
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Karren Price, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv04706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Atraqchi et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2021cv00956
Defendant:
Marie Hanson, Jackie Lemke, Mike Hanson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Atraqchi and Irene S. Atraqchi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HANSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47393
Plaintiff:
MIKE HANSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swisher v. Mason, County of et al
as 1:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Anthony Swisher
Defendant:
Mason, County of, Ludington, City of, Mike Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
