Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Las Ventanas Waterfront Village Homeowners Association v. Proyecto Las Ventanas, S. De R.L. De C.V. et al
as 3:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
Las Ventanas Waterfront Village Homeowners Association
Defendant:
Proyecto Las Ventanas, S. De R.L. De C.V., Waterfront Development Company, LCC , Las Ventanas Partnership, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DICUS v. LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01571
Defendant:
JARROD DUANE BRADBURY, DEVOY, LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MICHELLE DICUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON-TRATTNER v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2014cv01083
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, ROBERT CAMPBELL, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER R. WILSON-TRATTNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICUS v. LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01353
Defendant:
JARROD DUANE BRADBURY, DEVOY, LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MICHELLE DICUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennings et al v. Bonus Building Care, Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00663
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Jennings , Marcus Crosdale , Mike Hughes and others
Defendant:
Bonus Building Care, Inc, Bonus of America, Inc., Arleen Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MAMON v. SHEPHERD et al
as 1:2013cv00345
Defendant:
JORDAN CONLEY, ANDY CRAIG, RYAN GARRITY and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger Reed v. Mike Shepherd
as 10-56938
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER L. REED
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE SHEPHERD, Warden
Roger Reed v. Mike Shepherd
as 10-55616
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER L. REED
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE SHEPHERD, Warden
Roger Reed v. Mike Shepherd
as 08-55387
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER L. REED
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE SHEPHERD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
