Cases 11 - 20 of 72
USA v. Michael Mirando
as 17-50386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL MIRANDO, AKA Michael John Mirando
Hicks et al v. T.L. Cannon Management Corp. et al
as 3:2018cv01177
Plaintiff:
Emily Steitz, Danielle Bennett, Amanda Blesinger and others
Defendant:
Matthew J. Fairbairn, TLC North, LLC, John A. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
S. USA Life Insurance Company, Inc. v. Mirando et al
as 7:2018cv00544
Defendant:
Frank Anthony Mirando and David Howard Bromberg
Plaintiff:
S. USA Life Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
United States of America v. Michael Mirando
as 2:2017cv09086
Defendant:
MICHAEL MIRANDO
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garnishee:
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Mullis v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Garry D. Mullis
Defendant:
Antoine G. Caldwell, Dr. Cowen, Ms. Granison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Mirando
as 17-50386
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL MIRANDO, AKA Michael John Mirando
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mirando v. TWU Local 100 et al
as 1:2017cv04277
Defendant:
Dennis McCormick and TWU Local 100
Plaintiff:
Michael Mirando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mirando v. Lake County et al
as 1:2017cv03889
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mirando
Defendant:
Lake County, Armour Medical Service, Jason Humke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
