Cases 1 - 10 of 21,572
Kinchen et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02451
Plaintiff:
Mildred Kinchen and James Kinchen
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Schaefer v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01752
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaefer
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Kersey v. My Job Mobile
as 1:2024cv11081
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
My Job Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey v. Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Marquette Lumumba Mugabe Bey
Defendant:
Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri, Spire Energy, KC Water and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Borzenkova v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Valeriia Borzenkova
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Sisalli v. Heartpath Cardiovascular Services PLLC d/b/a Acclaimed Mobile Health et al
as 2:2024cv02951
Plaintiff:
Maximilian Sisalli
Defendant:
Heartpath Cardiovascular Services PLLC d/b/a Acclaimed Mobile Health d/b/a Acclaimed Mobile Health, John Quinn and Matthew Pfaeffle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
