Cases 1 - 10 of 1,310
Turner, Mason v. Monroe County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv10035
Plaintiff:
Mason C. Turner
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garth v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lady B. Garth
Defendant:
City of Aberdeen, Mississippi, Charles Scott, Monroe County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Monroe, County of
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Monroe, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Woodford v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv10313
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dominic Woodford
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Davis, McGary and others
Lotta v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2024cv06194
Plaintiff:
Vincent E Lotta
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Monroe County Sheriff Office, Eric Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cordney Hayes v. Edwin Sabillon, et al
as 24-10905
Plaintiff:
CORDNEY MALLORY HAYES
Defendant:
EDWIN SABILLON, Sergeant, Monroe County Detention Center and SAMUEL CARPENTAR, Deputy, Monroe County Detention Center
Proctor v. Vican et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Ronald E. Vican, Mark Peter Pazauhanich, Donald Fernbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mead v. Officer et al
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Dean Arthur Mead
Defendant:
B. Deckard Officer, BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and Monroe County Sheriff Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
