Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stilwill v. Prosecutor 67 District Court et al
as 2:2021cv11721
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Stilwill
Defendant:
Prosecutor 67 District Court, Genesee County Jail, District Court 67 and others
Brett v. Trump et al
as 3:2021cv00388
Defendant:
Jean Luc Brunnel, Bill Baromie, Mr. Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. New York State et al
as 1:2020cv05955
Defendant:
CO. Melendez, New York State and Morges
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. New York State et al
as 9:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Melendez, New York State and Morges
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Morges et al
as 1:2020cv03367
Defendant:
Seargeant John Doe, Melendez, All who worked 7am-3pm on May 14 2019 3 Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan v. Morge
as 5:2018cv00492
Defendant:
James J Morge
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morges et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2015cv11047
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Morges and Lucia Jimenez
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC., Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REUBEN v. OMI/ZONE 5 et al
as 2:2012cv01398
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. REUBEN
Defendant:
OMI/ZONE 5, OFFICER DOVER, CITY COUNTY MORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Garcia, et al (Roman)
as 12-3471
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rosalie Garcia, AKA Shorty, Luis Morges and Ricardo Silva, AKA Psycho
Defendant - Appellant:
Manuel Roman, AKA Manny
Rios v. Morges et al
as 1:2010cv07767
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rios
Defendant:
Calvin R. Morges, Clifford Mayfield and Arthur W. Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
