Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hiett v. Mowry et al
as 3:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Constance L. Hiett
Defendant:
Emily Mowry and ChildLaw Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McLaughlin et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03302
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Brad McLaughlin, Terry Raymond McCall, Douglas Wayne McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Sanderius Wright v. Tracy Myers
as 22-6452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDERIUS CLEON WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY DAWN MYERS, Victim/Accuser/Kroger Laborer, JENNIFER MOWRY BARON, Witness/Norfolk Police Department Investigator-Detective and LEL PIERCE, Accuser/Assistant Commonwealth Attorney
Wright v. Myers et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Sanderius Cleon Wright
Defendant:
Tracy Dawn Myers, Jennifer Mowry Baron and Lel Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
In re: C. Mowry
as 16-2333
Petitioner:
In re: C. JANE MOWRY, KATHLEEN LAMBERT, EDIE LORANT and others
:
Narro v. Edwards et al
as 1:2016cv03596
Plaintiff:
Fernando S. Narro
Defendant:
E. Edwards, Sgt. Diminski, D.O. Mowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mowry v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08137
Plaintiff:
Mary Mowry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mowry et al v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 2:2014cv26690
Plaintiff:
C. Jane Mowry and Richard D. Mowry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mowry v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02888
Plaintiff:
Tammy Mowry
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
