Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Bradley v. Mr. Burzinski et al
as 8:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Mr. Burzinski, Mr. Kimbrell, Mr. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hamm v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 9:2021cv03084
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health, John Magill, Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zlatin v. LMDC
as 3:2019cv00026
Defendant:
LMDC, Mr. Sanders, Melissa D. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Zlatin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Graves et al
as 3:2018cv02217
Defendant:
Mr. Bledsoe, Miss Baker, Miss Comitce and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Wexford Health Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv01019
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Ms. Duffell, Ms. Appling and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Harrison et al
as 5:2018ct03179
Defendant:
A. Green, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Steinbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mika'ya Shakur v. Henry Ponton
as 15-7252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKA'YA ALI SHAKUR
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, Warden, MRS. SANDERS, Hearing Officer and LT. MOICHECK, Lead Investigator
Myron Nunn v. N.C. Legislation
as 15-6902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYRON RODERICK NUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
N.C. LEGISLATION, FRANK PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
