Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Joel Muir v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1754
Plaintiff:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J. FREEMAN and others
Kashika Speed v. Mr. C. Maruka
as 24-6235
Plaintiff:
KASHIKA SPEED
Defendant:
MR. C. MARUKA, Warden, MR. KEVIN THOMPSON, (HSA), MRS. C. CARATHERS, (P.A.) and others
Smith v. Oppy et al
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
David M Smith
Defendant:
Mr. J. Oppy, Mr. Chinn, Mr. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Warden Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC, ROGER LEROY STOESZ, GCC INTERESTS, LLC doing business as MR. C'S BOAT & RV STORAGE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Solano v. MR. C CORPORATE SERVICES LLC
as 1:2023cv21640
Plaintiff:
Omar Solano
Defendant:
MR. C CORPORATE SERVICES LLC and MR. C COCONUT GROVE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Solano v. MR. C CORPORATE SERVICES LLC
as 1:2023cv21602
Plaintiff:
Omar Solano
Defendant:
MR. C CORPORATE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christy v. Sproul et al
as 3:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Shawn R. Christy
Respondent:
Dan Sproul, Mrs. C. Sozal and Kirsten Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
