Cases 1 - 10 of 16
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Mr Weber, Ms Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Washington v. Weber
as 23-3260
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MR. WEBER, Psychiatrist/SCI Rockview/Correctional Vendor
Simpson v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Eatric Simpson
Defendant:
Warden Weber, Assistant Weber Butler, Security Chief Harbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Mr. Weber
as 1:2021cv02305
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Bush
Respondent:
Mr. Weber, Ronald S. Weber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Porter, Brandon v. Dittman, M. et al
as 3:2020cv01061
Defendant:
Lt. Mr. Julson, Lt. Mr. Beuttner, Warden Mr. M. Dittman and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Raymond v. Novak, Sue et al
as 3:2020cv00441
Defendant:
T. Miller, B. Alt, James Greer and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavan v. United States of America et al
as 0:2020cv01072
Defendant:
Ms. Voss, Mr. Armstrong, Dr. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Seui Cavan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reinhardt v. Graham et al
as 8:2018cv03121
Defendant:
Warden Richard Graham, Jr., Mr. Weber and Lt. Butler
Plaintiff:
David Allen Reinhardt
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
O'Diah v. The State of New York
as 13-2066
Petitioner:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Respondent:
The State of New York, Brian Fischer, Michael Corcoran and others
Henson v. Miller
as 8:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
James W. Miller, P. Merling, A. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
