Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Maynard v. Correction Corp of America et al
as 4:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
John Charles Maynard
Defendant:
Correction Corp of America, Mr Ammon, Ms Wesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FILING ERROR
as 5:2017cv00571
Defendant:
Restore Master Contracting, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mr. Harry O. Turloff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 - Deceptive Trade Practices Act
Brooks v. Harris
as 4:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Brooks
Defendant:
Mr. Harris, Baldwin County Sheriff's Department, Baldwin County Sheriff's Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lilley v. Smith et al
as 5:2016ct03216
Plaintiff:
Chester Lilley
Defendant:
Paula Smith, Mrs. Harris and Dr. Mateakio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BLASKO v. GEO CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00938
Plaintiff:
TROY CHARLES BLASKO
Defendant:
ROBERT BURKE, KEITH BUTTS, GEO CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, MR. A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, WILLIAM BUCK ROGERS, Deputy Director and others
Arango v. Slocum et al
as 3:2014cv00570
Plaintiff:
Maximo Ramos Arango
Defendant:
Mr. Slocum, Mr. Harris, Mr. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Nicholas et al
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashad Moore
Defendant:
Kathy N. Nicholas, Mrs. A Dyer-Azuela, F.N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Social Security Administration Benefits Specialist Mrs Harris
as 4:2013mc02982
Plaintiff:
Willis Floyd Wiley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Benefits Specialist Mrs Harris
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
