Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Kolackovsky et al v. Town of Rockport
as 1:2024cv11139
Plaintiff: Mr. John T. Kolackovsky, Mr. Zenas B. Seppala, Ms. Anne Hyde and others
Defendant: Town of Rockport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ashford, Jr. v. Ray et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff: Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant: Mrs. Ray, Warden Briggs, Deputy Warden Levalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Ray et al
as 5:2023cv00256
Plaintiff: Todd G. Dean
Defendant: Mrs. Ray and Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCargo v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00139
Petitioner: Kareem McCargo
Respondent: Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dean v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff: Todd G. Dean
Defendant: Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Ray et al
as 5:2023ct03066
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Mr. Ray, David Randall Newman, R. Gonzolaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00046
Petitioner: Tammy Jean Holmes
Respondent: Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lee v. Riteway Truck and Auto et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff: Miles T. Lee
Defendant: Riteway Truck and Auto doing business as KO Towing Comp, Mr. Ray Tews, Gregory, Dole, Calhoun, and Rogers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
as 5:2023cv00012
Petitioner: Kevin W. Hanna
Respondent: FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hanna v. FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
as 5:2023cv00003
Petitioner: Kevin W. Hanna
Respondent: FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?