Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Haar v. Marshall et al
as 1:2025cv13426
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates v. Labat et al
as 1:2025cv00974
Plaintiff:
James Coates
Defendant:
Sheriff Pat Labat, Katherine Racz, Adrienne D. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Defendant:
Mr. Martin Logan, Mr. Russell Knuckles, Mrs. Kristen Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Farris E. Mallo
Respondent:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aron Freeland v. William Marshall
as 23-7085
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARON J. FREELAND
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM K. MARSHALL, Acting Commissioner and MR. RUSSELL MASTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Royal v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jarice L. Royal
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Bowen et al
as 5:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Salvador Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Mark Bowen, Mr. Caldwell, Mr. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardy v. Wallens Ridge et al
as 7:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge, Red Onion, River North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
