Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bilal Al-Haqq v. Mr. Mims
as 25-6875
Plaintiff:
BILAL A. AL-HAQQ
Defendant:
MR. MIMS, Classification Caseworker, MS. BUTLER, Classification Caseworker, STACI RICHARDSON, State Classification and others
Tucker v. Mershon et al
as 3:2025cv50053
Plaintiff:
James Tucker
Defendant:
Kristina Mershon, Ms. Sword, Ms. Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Haqq v. Stirling et al
as 2:2024cv02884
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Al-Haqq v. Mims et al
as 2:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Mr Mims, Ms. Butler, Staci Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flowers v. Lt. Galan et al
as 1:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Frederick Michael Flowers
Defendant:
Lt. Galan, Ms. Hill, Ms. Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarelis Rivera v. Ronald Edwards, et al
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YARELIS RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR RONALD P. EDWARDS, C.O. HOUGHTON, SERGEANT PRIEDE and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv03131
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY OFFICERS, HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CBP OFFICER FINE, in her official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
YARELIS RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
