Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Findley v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv01916
Plaintiff:
Darrell Allen Findley
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Center, Ashlee Rogers, Cpt. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Rodney Anderson
Defendant:
K. Kauffman, J. Rivello, Ms. C. Neri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Stewart
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, T. Carter, K. Jiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv01009
Defendant:
Sanuchi, H.R.R.j, Ms. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Confer et al
as 5:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
Ruth Burns
Defendant:
M. Confer, Ms. Hicks and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Bubb et al
as 1:2011cv05709
Defendant:
C.O. Abruzzo, C.O. Ms. Austin, Parole Officer Glenda Bubb and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Patterson et al
as 1:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
John White
Defendant:
Tony Patterson, Lesley Dodd, Ms. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Butts v. Dr. Ofogh
as 10-6528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE D. BUTTS
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. OFOGH, Physician, DR. TRIMBUR, Asst. Physician, NURSE CUNNINGHAM, Medical Director and others
Butts v. Dr. Ofar et al
as 2:2009cv00140
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Butts
Defendant:
Dr. Ofar, Dr. Trimble, Nurse Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
