Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Womack v. Philbin et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Womack
Defendant:
Warden Edwin Philbin, Ruthie Shelton, Dr. Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Captain Boxer
as 22-6359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN BOXER, LIEUTENANT MOSLEY, A. DAVID ROBINSON and others
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, Former Warden BLACK, MS HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaac Rodriguez v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-15085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC JUDE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, HACKER-AGNEW, Named as Ms. Hacker, Former Complex Warden at ASPC Yuma, ZARAGOZA, Named as Mr. Zaragoza, Former Deputy Warden at ASPC Yuma and others
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
Whiteing v. Miles et al
as 4:2020cv03210
Defendant:
Ms. Miles, Ms. Hudson, Ms. Corione and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Whiteing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigue v. Clarke et al
as 3:2020cv00505
Defendant:
Richard H. Pence, Mr. Sink, Brian J. Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Ray Vigue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Bernsen et al
as 4:2017cv01320
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Leon Watkins
Defendant:
Herbert L. Bernsen, Tena V. Johnson, Gerald Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. DALLAS et al
as 1:2013cv00731
Defendant:
MS ANGEL, EDDIE BUSS, DR COCKERELL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
