Cases 1 - 10 of 35
PRICE v. HARRY et al
as 3:2026cv00786
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, LAUREL R. HARRY, MS KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jude House et al
as 1:2025cv01753
Plaintiff:
SaFir Amie Jackson
Defendant:
Jude House, Ms. Kelly Doe and Ms. Crystal S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SEPULVEDA v. MS. KELLY et al
as 2:2025cv00804
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SEPULVEDA
Defendant:
MS. KELLY, MS. PARADISE, MS. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv04551
Defendant:
A Williams, Ms Kelly and Officer in Medical
Plaintiff:
Travers McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bien-Aime v. DOCCS et al
as 1:2024cv08797
Defendant:
DOCCS, John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Blaise Bien-Aime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65283
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kelli D. Tolliver
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kim v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv14033
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kellie M Kim
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shamel Jones v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAMEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, GEORGE LITTLE, EMPLOYEES OF THE DOC and others
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 6:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Smith, Justin White, Capt. Ms. Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
