Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Robert Andrew-Bey v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5069
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew-Bey
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland and Muriel Bowser
Mackey v. Werlich et al
as 3:2023cv03412
Plaintiff:
Muriel Mackey
Defendant:
Thomas Werlich, Faisal Ahmed, N Brown, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merlin Williams v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 23-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. Greenlee and others
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett, G.M. Alprin, Muriel Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Muriel Pitney
as 22-7044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MURIEL-THERESA PITNEY, Clerk, DONALD LEMONS, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia, BETH COBELL, Sussex I State Prison Warden and others
Meyers v. Pitney et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Muriel Pitney, Donald Lemons, Beth Cobell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody Presti v. Darren Telefoni, et al
as 22-15194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CODY JOSEPH PRESTI
Defendant / Appellee:
DARREN TELEFONI, ACO, JOHNSON, Captain, WENDEL YODA, CBA and others
Duane C. Allen v. Muriel Bowser et al
as 5:2022cv00199
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Muriel Bowser, District of Columbia Council and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
