Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Castronuova v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02523
Plaintiff:
Cara Castronuova
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., X Corp, Vivek Murthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Eisen, Inc. v. Mertz et al
as 1:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Eisen, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephanie Mertz and Monica Murthy
Kennedy v. Biden
as 24-30252
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Childrens Health Defense and Connie Sampognaro
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Karine Jean-Pierre, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Patel v. United States District Court for the District of Montana, Helena
as 24-635
Petitioner:
RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS and others
Patel v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, United States President, ALL CABINET OFFICERS and others
Easterling v. Murthy
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kevin Easterling
Defendant:
Ravindra Murthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
The Excellent Raj K. Patel v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
United States, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
