Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Henderson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ashleah N Henderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
AIX Specialty Insurance Company v. 2107 N Henderson Avenue LLC
as 3:2022cv02389
Plaintiff:
AIX Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
2107 N. Henderson Avenue, LLC and 2107 N Henderson Avenue LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
David Getzen v. J. Barby, et al
as 20-17243
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MATTOX, A. RUSSELL, CAROL KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GETZEN
David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
as 20-17244
Defendant / Appellee:
M. PERRY, MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge, JARAMILLO, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GETZEN
Getzen v. Barby et al
as 3:2020cv08063
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, B Carrillo, N Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
David M Getzen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Getzen v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08053
Plaintiff:
David Getzen
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Coconino, County of, Unknown Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pham, DDS v. Texas Dental Board Examiner et al
as 1:2017cv01008
Defendant:
Emily W. Christy, Lois M. Palermo, R.D.H., Kelly Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Tuan Thanh Pham, DDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Henderson v. Pierce County
as 3:2017cv05099
Plaintiff:
Akeem N Henderson
Defendant:
Pierce County , Mark Lindquist, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael McCloud v. A. Funaiock
as 16-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCLOUD
Defendant - Appellee:
A. M. FUNAIOCK
Defendant:
KAREN N. HENDERSON
Snyder v. Henderson et al
as 2:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Michael Snyder
Defendant:
Richard N Henderson, Pike County Sheriff's Department , Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
