Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Parks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carlton B Parks
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Travis R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
NAPOLITAN v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17084
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A NAPOLITAN
Defendant:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SUBHER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
MARK SUBHER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-5, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Napolitan v. Snyder's-Lance, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12099
Plaintiff:
Rick Napolitan
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Napolitan v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
as 17-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND A. NAPOLITAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Martin v. Mantooth et al
as 3:2017cv00869
Plaintiff:
Kelly L. Martin
Defendant:
Randy Mantooth, Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Ogle et al v. Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan, PLLC
as 2:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ogle and Donna Ogle
Defendant:
Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NAPOLITAN v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2015cv00912
Petitioner:
RAYMOND A. NAPOLITAN
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norris Williams v. Michael Pecko, et al
as 15-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORRIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PECKO, #91, WOMER, Officers, #2630, NAPOLITAN, Officer, #3492 and others
USA v. Raymond Napolitan
as 15-1602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND ANTHONY NAPOLITAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
