Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ReliaStar Life Insurance Company v. Robinson et al
as 4:2023cv01053
Counter Defendant:
ReliaStar Life Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Connie Robinson
Cross Claimant:
Amanda Robinson
Defendant:
Rebecca L Robinson, Nathan Robinson, William R Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20835
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scarboro et al v. Weinstein et al
as 4:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Michael Scarboro, Olan Doctor, Yolanda Johnson and others
Defendant:
Benjamin Weinstein, Blue Rise Group, LLC and Seaview Apartments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08709
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25976
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. NIFCO America Corp.
as 3:2017cv00760
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robinson
Defendant:
NIFCO America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
