Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SCHAEFER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv37661
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JOHN SCHAEFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weibel v. Alexander et al
as 4:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel John Ross Weibel
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, J Kelly, J Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weibel v. United States Penitentiary, Tucson et al
as 4:2018cv00463
Defendant:
Unknown Alexander, Unknown Williams, United States Penitentiary, Tucson and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Weibel and Nathaniel John Ross Weibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johns v. USA
as 3:2017cv02152
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lucas Nathaniel Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Nathaniel Little
as 16-3023
Petitioner:
In re: NATHANIEL JOHN LITTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johns v. McKune, et al
as 13-3289
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JOHNS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, STATE OF KANSAS and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Spey et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03183
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Spey , Wendy Jean Spey and Nathaniel John Spey
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC , Johnson Controls, Inc. , Britax Child Safety, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johns (ID 07993) v. McKune et al
as 5:2012cv03037
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johns
Respondent:
David R. McKune, Kansas, State of and Steve Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reedy, et al v. Werholtz
as 11-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. REEDY, TODD DEAL, GRANT NIXON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections
Johns v. Bloomingdale Dept. Store
as 1:2010cv02139
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johns
Defendant:
Bloomingdale Dept. Store
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
