Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Pollard et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04392
Plaintiff:
Carol Pollard and Ned Edwin Pollard
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Republic National Distributing Company LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02758
Defendant:
Republic National Distributing Company LLC, John Deitz, Gary Herd and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14910
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Lewis and Ned A. Lewis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Milhouse v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 6:2013cv00665
Plaintiff:
Ned Milhouse
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Koepsel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08031
Plaintiff:
Susan Koepsel and Ned Koepsel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barnard v. Andrews
as 2:2012cv00191
Petitioner:
Julius M. Barnard
Defendant:
Ned Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnett et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00527
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Barnett and Ned Barnett
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
English v. Longshore et al
as 3:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
Roderick English
Defendant:
Ned Longshore and Judge Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Ned's Marine & Auto Center, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Ned's Marine & Auto Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
