Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jessie Blankenship v. Nicholas Gray
as 26-1314
Plaintiff:
JESSIE BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GRAY
(PC) Gray v. Sacramento Police Dept., et al
as 2:2025cv02645
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gray
Defendant:
Sacramento Police Department and Ratcliffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorenson v. Gray et al
as 1:2025cv00632
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Sorenson
Defendant:
Nicholas Gray and Robert B. Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
ANDERSON et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2025cv00106
Plaintiff:
LARRY ANDERSON, JACOB ARNOLD, MICHAEL BAILEY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gray
Defendant:
Barry Hyde, Nelson and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Defendant:
DARSHAN KARWAT, POLARIS STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, MARCUS LEHMANN and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Blankenship, Jessie v. Gray, Nicholas
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jessie Blankenship
Defendant:
Nicholas Gray
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gray v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gray
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company and Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
