Cases 1 - 10 of 31
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, PHILADELPHIA-BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 96 and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (aliens and nationality)
Restaurant Law Center et al v. City and County of Denver, The
as 1:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
National Apartment Association, Restaurant Law Center, American Hotel & Lodging Association and others
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6201 - Energy Policy & Conservation Act (Statement of Purpose)
Cuara R. v. Post District Residences et al
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Post District Residences, Rescue Mission of SLC, Homeless Resource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Mescall v. Renaissance at Antiquity et al
as 3:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Gerald Thomas Mescall
Defendant:
Renaissance at Antiquity, Gem Management LLC, National Apartment Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
State of TX v. EPA
as 23-40306
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
West Virginia, State of et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Intervenor:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Commission On Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
American Farm Bureau Federation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mossman et al v. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 1:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Asa Mossman, Richard McConkie, Millstone Properties, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Rochelle P. Walensky, Norris Cochran, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
