Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Lewis v. Powers
as 19-1424
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. POWERS and CITY OF LITTLETON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUPITA LEWIS
Defendant:
ERMA'S MEXICAN FOOD, COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND, CZ FAMCO HOLDINGS, LLC and others
State of New York v. United States Department of Ho
as 19-3591
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of New York, State of New York, State of Vermont and others
Petitioner:
Citizens' Committee for Children of New York, American Public Health Association, Little Lobbyists and others
Roy Payan, et al v. LACCD
as 19-56146
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY PAYAN, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cook County, Illinois et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv06334
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI II, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency and others
Plaintiff:
Cook County, Illinois, an Illinois governmental entity, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Inc. and Cook County, Illinois
Amicus Curiae:
Nevada Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence, Sexual Violence Law Center, Equip for Equality and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-56111
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12578
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Make the Road New York et al v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2019cv07993
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York), Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Make the Road New York and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Public Health Association, Congressional Tri-Caucus, American Academy of Nursing and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Asian Americans Advancing Justice/Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund/National Women's Law Center, Economic Progress Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv05210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs, Little Lobbyists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
