Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Calove v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv02953
Counter Claimant:
Marina Calove
Counter Defendant:
Bobby Choudhury, Clark County, County of Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Easton et al
as 3:2016cv01387
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
Scott E Easton, Unknown Spouse of Scott E. Easton and Cambridge Estates Homeowners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Riley v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 3:2016cv03301
Plaintiff:
Annette I Riley
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Lexington County, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01813
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv01536
Plaintiff:
A. Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and US Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Esperanza Corral, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 16-16727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESPERANZA CORRAL and DIANA BALGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC and others
HERZ v. PESCOVITZ et al
as 1:2016cv01360
Defendant:
U.S. SEN. EVAN BAYH, SUSAN BROOKS, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Corral et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv02235
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Corral and Diana Balgas
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
