Cases 21 - 30 of 234
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Coit et al
as 8:2021cv01827
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INC. doing business as Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Janet Coit, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Petitioner:
American Petroleum Institute and International Association of Geophysical Contractors
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
WyoSayNo et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2021cv05663
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
WyoSayNo, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Connecticut v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 21-1446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, by its Attorney General, William M. Tong
Defendant / Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., City of New York and State of New York, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin and District of Columbia
Faust et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2021cv00548
Plaintiff:
Adam P Faust, Jon Stevens, Joseph W Schmitz and others
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack, Zack Duchaneaux and Zach Ducheneaux
Amicus Curiae:
Community Farm Alliance, Rural Coalition, Kansas Black Farmers Association and others
Petitioner:
Lee Perry and Corey Lea
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Miller et al v. Vilsack
as 4:2021cv00595
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack and Federation of Southern Cooperatives/Land Assistance Fund
Plaintiff:
Sid Miller, James Meek, Greg Macha and others
Petitioner:
Corey Lea, Lee Perry, Scott Wynn and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Black Farmers Association (NBFA) and Association of American Indian Farmers (AAIF)
Amicus Curiae:
Rural Coalition, Intertribal Agriculture Council, North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers Land Loss Prevention Project and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. et al v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00770
Defendant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and MARTHA WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA SCIENTIFIC AND NATURAL AREAS and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
The Art and Antique Dealers Le v. Basil Seggos
as 21-569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Art and Antique Dealers League of America, Inc. and The National Art and Antique Dealers Association of America, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Basil Seggos, in his official capacity, as the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., The Humane Society of the United States and others
Natural Resources Defense Coun v. National Highway Traffic Safet
as 21-139
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and Sierra Club
Respondent:
Lana Hurdle, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00561
Defendant:
United States Fish And Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
National Audubon Society et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff:
National Audubon Society, Sierra Club, National Wildlife Federation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Oregon, State of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 703
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
