Cases 11 - 20 of 3,475
Navarro v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC
as 4:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Margaret Navarro
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert Crisp v. Richard Navarro et al
as 2:2024cv02550
Plaintiff:
Robert Crisp
Defendant:
Richard Navarro and Zack King
Jonathan Colorado Navarro v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1253
Petitioner:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER COLORADO NAVARRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Fortaleza Equity Partners REO I, LLC v. Silva-Navarro
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
FORTALEZA EQUITY PARTNERS I, LLC and ROOSEVELT CAYMAN ASSETS COMPANY I
Defendant:
VIRGINIA SILVA-NAVARRO, ISABEL LUGO-VELEZ, UNITED STATES and others
Higgs v. Urbanski et al
as 1:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Jayden Higgs
Defendant:
Raymond Urbanski, Roger Farias, Gabriel Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Navarro v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Navarro
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NAVARRO v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02865
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
LETICIA NAVARRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States v. Eleuterio Meza-Navarro
as 24-1524
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eleuterio Meza-Navarro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
