Cases 81 - 90 of 8,791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Roberson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00241
Petitioner:
Neil James Roberson
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hoffman Transport LLC v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
HOFFMAN TRANSPORT LLC
Defendant:
United States, ERIC NEIL BRIMM, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Riddick et al v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Bert Riddick, Harry Crouch, Bill Greenblatt and others
Defendant:
Sony Electronics Inc., Michaela Ion, Matthew Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Neil Dorval v. Fariba K. Rahimi
as 2:2024cv01347
Petitioner:
Mr. Neil Dorval and Fariba K Rahimi
Plaintiff:
Neil Dorval
Defendant:
Kate Rahimi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
S2 Growth I LLC v. Romulus Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10398
Plaintiff:
S2 Growth I LLC
Defendant:
Romulus Capital Management, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth III LP, Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
