Cases 1 - 10 of 8,766
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Riddick et al v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Bert Riddick, Harry Crouch, Bill Greenblatt and others
Defendant:
Sony Electronics Inc., Michaela Ion, Matthew Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
S2 Growth I LLC v. Romulus Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10398
Plaintiff:
S2 Growth I LLC
Defendant:
Romulus Capital Management, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth III LP, Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sloane v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65288
Plaintiff:
Neil Sloane
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Nathaniel Josey
as 24-6358
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHANIEL JOSEY, a/k/a Neil
WAYNE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05085
Plaintiff:
STACEY WAYNE and NEIL KANOFF
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.,, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
