Cases 1 - 10 of 324
RIVERA v. ACE FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv02610
Plaintiff:
EZEQUIEL RIVERA
Defendant:
ACE FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC and NESTLE USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Beam v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Beam
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Rivera v. ACE Fire Underwriters Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Ezequiel Rivera
Defendant:
ACE Fire Underwriters Insurance Company, Nestle USA Inc and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Easterling v. Nestle USA Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian Easterling
Defendant:
Nestle USA Inc, Vitality Foodservice Inc, Nestle Prepared Foods Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
O'Rourke v. Nestle USA Inc.
as 2:2024cv01607
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Rourke
Defendant:
Nestle USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Richey v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Sandra Richey
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
