Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Purisima v. Babcock et al
as 1:2023cv01543
Plaintiff: Anton C. Purisima, Four Son's of Anton C. Purisima, United States of America and others
Defendant: Morgan Babcock, City of New York, New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
City of Fort Lauderdale Police And Firefighters' Retirement System v. Pegasystems Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00578
Plaintiff: City of Fort Lauderdale Police And Firefighters' Retirement System, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Defined Benefit Plan, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Retirement Income Plan 1987 and others
Defendant: Pegasystems Inc., Alan Trefler and Kenneth Stillwell
Petitioner: Boston Retirement System, New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund and DeKalb County Pension Fund
GLOBAL CONTACT SERVICES v. THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY et al.
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff: Global Contact Services
Defendant: The Burlington Insurance Company and New York City Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Type: Contract Insurance
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Defendant: Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Plaintiff: Sister E. Jones-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Anton Purisima v. County of Arlington Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1111
Defendant / Appellee: CORY BOOKER, "Collectively Defendants", KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, "Collectively Defendants",Democratic, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, "Collectively Defendants" and others
Plaintiff: DOES 1 - 100, Collectively "Plaintiffs" and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, "The USA"
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTON PURISIMA
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant: OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae: SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
Frank Heindel v. Marci Andino
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT MOSELY, Member of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, BILLY WAY, JR., Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, MARCI ANDINO, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANK HEINDEL and PHIL P. LEVENTIS
Amicus Curiae: MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, Secretary of State for New Mexico, DUNCAN A. BUELL, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering and NCR Chair of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, JOSEPH R. KINIRY, Principal Scientist, Galois, and Principled CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair and others
Tyrone Hurt v. Baltimore MD, Chief of Police We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2325
Plaintiff - Appellant: TYRONE HURT
Plaintiff: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, of New York City, INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS and INTERNATIONAL PEACE COURT
Defendant - Appellee: BALTIMORE MARYLAND, CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officers and NEW YORK CITY, CHIEF OF POLICE, and all law enforcement officers
Hurt et al v. Baltimore Maryland, Chief of Police et al
as 5:2015cv00320
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt, A.C.L.U., International Criminal Court and others
Defendant: Baltimore Maryland, Chief of Police and New York City, Chief of Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marriott International, Inc. v. New York City Department of Education
as 8:2012cv00875
Plaintiff: Marriott International, Inc.
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?