Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Cholewa v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv05483
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Cholewa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cholewa v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv05483
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Cholewa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armstrong v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
Desmond R. Armstrong
Interested Party:
Anthony Belfiore, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corporation and others
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Palmer v. CVS Health et al
as 1:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Steven Palmer and Ellen Palmer
Defendant:
CVS Health and Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haso Ltd. et al v. Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04091
Plaintiff:
Haso Ltd. and Haso USA Inc.
Defendant:
Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Nice-Pak Products, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Haso Ltd. and Haso USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
