Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Flynn v. Weissmann et al
as 1:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Flynn
Defendant:
Andrew Weissmann, NICOLLE WALLACE and MSNBC Cable L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Flynn v. Weissmann et al
as 8:2023cv02429
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Flynn
Defendant:
ANDREW WEISSMANN, NICOLLE WALLACE, MSNBC CABLE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Clarke v. Wallace
as 3:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Nicole Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00738
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WALLACE v. BAUGHMAN et al
as 2:2020cv00637
Respondent:
MICHAEL BAUGHMAN and ORLANDO HARPER
Petitioner:
NICOLE WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wallace v. Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 1:2019cv03833
Defendant:
John Does 1-2, Tyrone Oliver, Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02218
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nicole Wallace
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wallace et al v. Mayor and City Council Baltimore City et al
as 1:2017cv03718
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council Baltimore City , Stephen T. Moyer , Ricky Foxwell and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Wallace and Daquan M. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chaula Bhatt v. John Hoffman, et al
as 17-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Former NJ AG, AT&T INC, And Nationwide AT&T Subsidiaries, DENNIS M. GALVIN and others
BHATT v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2016cv03715
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
AT&T INC., COLLABERA INC., MICHAEL CHIRICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
