Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Ninety Nine Plus, LLC v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv01450
Plaintiff:
Ninety Nine Plus, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Esparza v. 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Anna Esparza
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc. doing business as Ninety Nine cents Only Store #2848 also known as 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc. also known as 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC. also known as 99 Only Stores TX Headquarters & Distribution Centers also kno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wang v. New York-New Jersey Section of
as 21-2552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Julie Wang
Defendant / Appellee:
The Ninety-Nines, Inc.
Defendant:
New York-New Jersey Section of the Ninety-Nines Inc.
SEIZURE OF THREE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED NINETY NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY ONE DOLLARS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2021mc00071
Petitioner:
SEIZURE OF THREE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED NINETY NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY ONE DOLLARS IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp.
as 20-2914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Phaisit Sirimatrasit, Paranee Sarikaputar, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Kamphol Kiatwanakorn and others
Defendant:
Excel Restaurant Group Corp., DBA Charm's, Ninety-Nine Plus Corp, DBA ThaiNY, DBA M-Thai, DBA Thai Rice, DBA Tom Yum, Adidsuda Chunton, AKA Amy Chunton and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael P. Bronstein
Sarikaputar et al v. Veratip Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv11168
Defendant:
Chardenpong Oonapanyo, Perapong Chotimanenophan, Adidsuda Chunton and others
Plaintiff:
Chaichana Kittironnakornkul, Phouviengsone Sysouvong, PEDRO COJ CUMES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Fifty Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-Nine Dollars and Fifty Cents ($50,699.50) et al
as 1:2019cv05408
Defendant:
Nine Hundred Seven Dollars and Twenty Cents($907.20), Fifty Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-Nine Dollars and Fifty Cents ($50,699.50) and Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred Nine Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($18,709.13)
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Wang v. New York-New Jersey Section of the Ninety-Nines Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01780
Plaintiff:
Julie Wang
Defendant:
New York-New Jersey Section of the Ninety-Nines Inc. and The Ninety-Nines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Central Park Apartments et al v. Tellis
as 1:2017cv04585
Plaintiff:
Central Park Apartments and Ninety Nine Investments
Defendant:
Shawntee Lavon Tellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
