Cases 51 - 60 of 468
DeLeon v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2021cv00224
Plaintiff:
Mark DeLeon
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Not Classified By Court:
Stuart A Nudleman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MARTZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2021cv02750
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Posey v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc et al
as 7:2021cv00870
Defendant:
Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, The and Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Posey
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MARTZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2021cv02750
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTZ, SR.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ragan v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert Ragan
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Adam L Hill
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wyatt v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Albert M. Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beasley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCoy v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 7:2021cv00158
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and National Salvage & Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ireland McCoy, II
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Parks v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 7:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and National Salvage & Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joshua N. Parks
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
