Cases 11 - 20 of 57
A-O-O v. Master et al
as 1:2019cv08579
Defendant:
Morris Heights Health Center, Inc., St. Barnabas Hospital, St. Barnabas OB/GYN, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Amoyaw and A-O-O
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Crossfit, Inc. v. Matrix Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00887
Defendant:
ABC Corp., Matrix Solutions, LLC, Progenex Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Crossfit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Mildred Veliz-Osuna, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60058
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
O. O. P. V., A. L. P. V. and MILDRED LISETH VELIZ-OSUNA
O'Hare v. Mnuchin
as 1:2017cv08187
Plaintiff:
Thomas O. O'Hare
Defendant:
Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRUZ et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv12116
Plaintiff:
JOYCE CRUZ , A. C.1. , A. C.2. and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., LEO A. DALY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Hughes et al
as 1:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Malone
Defendant:
Justin Hughes, Linner Mahlman, William Cool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Hughes et al
as 2:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Malone
Defendant:
Justin Hughes, Linner Mahlman, William Cool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. O O I D A Risk Retention Group Inc
as 6:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Derrick Darnell Reid
Defendant:
O O I D A Risk Retention Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
French v. McCoy et al
as 2:2016cv01305
Defendant:
O/O F. Brown, O/O Ellsted, Sgt. Hazen and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Brown
as 2:2016cv01303
Defendant:
O/O F. Brown
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
