Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Vaughn v. SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134 et al
as 2:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Vaughn
Defendant:
SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134, Ofc. Smith, Ofc. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siggers v. Hamp et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Reno Fenelli Siggers
Defendant:
K.C. Hamp, Sr., Jammie Lewis, Ms. Persundra Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Baxter et al
as 4:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Baxter, Clp. Willis, Ofc. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowe v. Wray et al
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Donta Malik Dowe
Defendant:
Patricia Wray, Willie Sweat, Major Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Baker v. Salmon et al
as 7:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
Wesley E. Baker, II
Defendant:
Ofc. Westin, Ann, Ofc. Quill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Warden I. Hamilton
as 21-6660
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA FOREMAN, DR. ULEP, TINYA FOREMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Jones v. Palmer et al
as 1:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Ofc. Smith, Brishon, Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2020cv02513
Defendant:
Sgt. Harris, Ofc. Watlans, Ofc. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6625
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
