Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Yanni v. City of Titusville et al
as 6:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Samuel Yanni
Defendant:
City of Titusville, City of Titusville Police Department, Ofc. Christopher Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hines v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hines
Defendant:
Ofc. William Jenkins, Sgt. Christopher Dale Robinson, Ofc. Josh Adam Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MIKE KELLY, SGT. LISA JOHNSON, DON GEIGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Baxter et al
as 4:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Baxter, Clp. Willis, Ofc. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Preston Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Ofc. Thompson, Ofc(s) of A&B Day & Night Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Faye et al
as 5:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
OFC. William Faye, Justin Fowler, Seth Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Faye et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
OFC. William Faye, Justin Fowler, Seth Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. FLOYD et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
JOE FLOYD, LIEUTENANT NELSON, CORPORAL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Davis et al
as 3:2021cv00231
Defendant:
Sgt. Watson, John Doe, Captain Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Welcher et al
as 4:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Sheriff John Welcher, Chatham County Detention Center, Ofc. Cleitt and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
